<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiger vs the field in the Masters</title>
	<link>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Kevin - If Trevor was individually listed, then no, the "field" would not include him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin - If Trevor was individually listed, then no, the &#8220;field&#8221; would not include him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Steve,
You are right but I have a question...Trevor was individually listed so did "the field" include him this year???  I saw one book had him at 125 to 1 and another at 80 to 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
You are right but I have a question&#8230;Trevor was individually listed so did &#8220;the field&#8221; include him this year???  I saw one book had him at 125 to 1 and another at 80 to 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.dealadaygolf.com/blog/2008/04/09/tiger-vs-the-field-in-the-masters/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Very true, but that's now how golf bets work.  Usually what happens is they'll give you about the top 30 players, each with their individual odds.  Then, they have a separate bet, for "everyone else".  Of course this year, "everyone else" would've won you $$.

And yes, betting Tiger is the sucker bet, no doubt about that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true, but that&#8217;s now how golf bets work.  Usually what happens is they&#8217;ll give you about the top 30 players, each with their individual odds.  Then, they have a separate bet, for &#8220;everyone else&#8221;.  Of course this year, &#8220;everyone else&#8221; would&#8217;ve won you $$.</p>
<p>And yes, betting Tiger is the sucker bet, no doubt about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
